Short-term Profit versus Long-Term Sustainability: CSR & Successfully Competing for the Future
As an article in yesterday’s Washington Post, entitled Opportunity for Corporate Fraud Has Shrunk – But it’s Still There (Thursday, January 26, 2006; D01) says, “Despite new laws and regulations, companies still face enormous pressure to meet short-term financial goals, creating a powerful motive for accounting fraud. Outsized executive compensation grows by the year, offering another rich incentive to cook the books.”
Even when companies perform well in an increasingly competitive business environment, it is not uncommon for their stock prices to fall when they do not exceed Wall Street’s expectations. The intense pressure to show profits, the relentless push to show continuous growth, no matter what, has no doubt fueled the spectacular failures of companies like Enron, Worldcom, Global Crossing, Adelphi, and others. Pressure of this kind can lead executives to take actions that bring short-term reward, at long term cost.
Much, but not all, of the issue may be boiled down to a question of corporate ethics and leadership. What are the priorities of a given company? Are they solely to maximize executive compensation and shareholder value? Or, is the business focused on doing the right thing, which pays off by building a brand that engenders customer trust and loyalty? The question is how seriously is a culture of doing the right thing embedded within the DNA of a given corporation?
This is where the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR) comes in. CSR, as readers of this blog know, is the idea that business has an intrinsic responsibility to manage its processes so as to limit damage to economic, social, and environmental systems; and further, that overall business strategy should be aligned with larger social goals. Even though Enron talked a good CSR game in its day, it’s clear that CSR principles were not really integrated into its business strategy and operations.
At DCSBN we believe CSR, at its core, is representative not just of ‘doing the right thing,’ but as an increasing amount of evidence shows, it’s good business practice. In some senses, CSR can be considered an enlightened form of self-interest: ‘Do good and you shall do well.’ But, perhaps its even more important to understand that CSR is about successfully competing for the future: Today’s cutting-edge business leaders are convinced that a focus on a triple bottom line of people, planets and profit will help them realize enhanced performance at lower cost, appeal to a growing number of environmentally- and socially-conscious consumers, attract and retain top-flight talent, proactively mitigate risk, and take advantage of sustainability-driven innovations to develop tomorrow’s markets.
Stop and think about this last point for a moment: Five years ago, caught in the grip of SUV-fever, few would have predicted the current demand for hybrid automobiles. Today, as they are outpaced by nimbler competitors like Toyota and Honda, which offer cheaper yet reliable cars that get great gas mileage, Ford and GM managers are probably wishing they had in the words of a recent Arthur Little report ‘seized the innovation high ground,’ to “create new market space, products and services which are driven by underlying social, environmental, economic trends.”
Even when companies perform well in an increasingly competitive business environment, it is not uncommon for their stock prices to fall when they do not exceed Wall Street’s expectations. The intense pressure to show profits, the relentless push to show continuous growth, no matter what, has no doubt fueled the spectacular failures of companies like Enron, Worldcom, Global Crossing, Adelphi, and others. Pressure of this kind can lead executives to take actions that bring short-term reward, at long term cost.
Much, but not all, of the issue may be boiled down to a question of corporate ethics and leadership. What are the priorities of a given company? Are they solely to maximize executive compensation and shareholder value? Or, is the business focused on doing the right thing, which pays off by building a brand that engenders customer trust and loyalty? The question is how seriously is a culture of doing the right thing embedded within the DNA of a given corporation?
This is where the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR) comes in. CSR, as readers of this blog know, is the idea that business has an intrinsic responsibility to manage its processes so as to limit damage to economic, social, and environmental systems; and further, that overall business strategy should be aligned with larger social goals. Even though Enron talked a good CSR game in its day, it’s clear that CSR principles were not really integrated into its business strategy and operations.
At DCSBN we believe CSR, at its core, is representative not just of ‘doing the right thing,’ but as an increasing amount of evidence shows, it’s good business practice. In some senses, CSR can be considered an enlightened form of self-interest: ‘Do good and you shall do well.’ But, perhaps its even more important to understand that CSR is about successfully competing for the future: Today’s cutting-edge business leaders are convinced that a focus on a triple bottom line of people, planets and profit will help them realize enhanced performance at lower cost, appeal to a growing number of environmentally- and socially-conscious consumers, attract and retain top-flight talent, proactively mitigate risk, and take advantage of sustainability-driven innovations to develop tomorrow’s markets.
Stop and think about this last point for a moment: Five years ago, caught in the grip of SUV-fever, few would have predicted the current demand for hybrid automobiles. Today, as they are outpaced by nimbler competitors like Toyota and Honda, which offer cheaper yet reliable cars that get great gas mileage, Ford and GM managers are probably wishing they had in the words of a recent Arthur Little report ‘seized the innovation high ground,’ to “create new market space, products and services which are driven by underlying social, environmental, economic trends.”